IntraTeam Event 2015 – The intranet is dead! Long live the intranet!

March 10, 2015
Intrateam Event 2015 Opening

Mr. IntraTeam (aka Kurt Kragh Sørensen) kicks off the event

Just before the end of this year’s IntraTeam Event a few weeks back, Martin White sat down next to me for a chat about the two days and how it had been. One of his first comments were: “People are so much more positive than last year. It seems like the optimism is returning to the community”. I hadn’t reallt thought about it but Martin’s comment made me reflect a little on the conversations thatI had over the last couple of days and I certainly see the same pattern.

Compared to the same event 2013 (I was unable to attend last year) and other events I have been to though 2014, the conversations were indeed much more forward looking and I think this is driven by two things:

  1. The financial crisis is nearing the end. We are not out of the woods yet, but there is little doubt that we are closer to the end than to the beginning.
  2. More and more companies are moving their collaboration solutions to either cloud based solutions or hybrid solutions. Interestingly, this on its own does not drive development of new exciting things, but things are moving and no matter how you twist and turn it, a cloud based platform ‘forces’ you to re-think some of your applications and with a stronger focus on the business value and user experience, this will result in better solutions.

The only thing still nagging is that the development is still not driven by business needs (although they are becoming more common) but by the technology and migration efforts. I’m looking forward to Jane McConnell publishes the results of this year’s Digital Workplace Trends survey to see whether or not this is true. If I’m proven wrong I will readily admit it and do so with a BIG smile!

Dave Snowden - Knowing

7 characteristics of Knowing by Dave Snowden

“Micro narratives are the basic units of sensemaking in human society.”
A trends that has been growing over the last years is the importance of narratives in the development of new solutions. Look back 5 years and most new and innovative solutions were about improving existing capabilities through better use of the underlying tech. “…But Martin – That’s still the case! I don’t buy that” – While I will not disagree with you I think that examples like the HR solution from Telstra and the new intranet from ABB shows that we are learning from the ‘first generation’ where focus was to make things available, we are now focusing more about the contexts in which the solutions will work.

The header for this paragraph is a quote from David Snowden who really hit the nail on the head here: If we listen to eachother and focus less on the glamourous world of technology, we will both understand each other better and ultimately become better at helping each other out. A place where this has been very apparent has been in the ‘chasm’ between business and IT, but with IT becoming more aware of the business needs combined with a growing IT acumen in the Line of Business I think we are in good shape. Now it’s just about how to work together.

Robertson - Telstra

James Robertson presenting the Telstra HR dashboard

Are we still living on MOSS?
On the other hand I still find it problematic that many (unfortunately) are still using the same thinking around prioritisation of content as they used when they built their MOSS2007 intranet and this is a real shame. Why do we still think “corporate news” when we design a new front page? Why do we still add share prices and weather forecasts to the front page? You can argue that it’s because our colleagues want them there – and let’s not forget about the lunch menu – but is this really true? Or is it a case of people not knowing what to expect?

In one of my previous roles I did an intranet survey and while the overall picture was that people were generally satisfied with the intranet, you could see some interesting trends when digging a little deeper. I found a strong corelation between age and tenure vs. Intranet satisfaction. The younger (and the shorter tenure), the lower the satisfaction. Expectations are rising once again driven by consumer products and it’s up to the digital workplace community to rise to that challenge. We need to take more risks and build an intranet that is essentially not just a faster horse.

Another obituary for the intranet
Once again the death of the intranet was announced. This is certainly something I have heard before. Will the intranet change? Yes. Will the term ‘intranet’ (laden will all the baggage of the past) give way to a new term – dare I suggest “the [insert buzzword] portal”? That would not be unlikely as I believe that the clouds rolling in will enable us to deliver the portal solution in the way it was meant to be in the first place. The idea that “The Intranet” will increasingly become a number loosely coupled apps may very well be true but we will still be looking for that infamous single point of access.

What I took away….
The optimism is back, the user experience is increasingly important, the people working with this are as passionate as ever – I’m confident that the announced death of the intranet is hugely exaggerated!


More about the event – here are a couple of good places to start.

IntraTeam has already published the first two recordings and worth a closer look:

How ‘design thinking’ is transforming intranets
James Robertson – StepTwo Design

The organisation as a loosely coupled network
David Snowden – Cognitive Edge

For an excellent session-by-session summary, check out Sam Marshall‘s live blogs here.
IntraTeam Event 2015 – Day 1
IntraTeam Event 2015 – Day 2

The Event storifi’ed by Dana Leeson

Conference notes shared by Samuel Driessen
Notes from day 2 IntraTeam Event Copenhagen 
Notes from day 3 IntraTeam Event Copenhagen 

Sprints, leaps and baby steps – What it takes to make an intranet strategy work.

May 13, 2013

Next week I’m speaking at Intranätverk – the newest star on the intranet conference sky. Kristian Norling has done a remarkable job of putting together a great lineup of speakers mostly from Sweden but also some notable people from around Europe. Kristian promises to bring a twist to the regular intranet conference and I am happy to play my part in making this happen.

My talk will be about intranet strategy and how we at Grundfos have been quite successful with a more sustained model but now find ourselves faced with a challenge. It will not be about Sharepoint although there IS new version out there which is awfully hard to ignore. Heck, just last week I walked though Copenhagen Airport where Microsoft banners lined the security check area. I’m sure there are a whole bunch of jokes that can be made based on that but I’ll leave that up to you J

A new Sharepoint – that also means that whenever intranet peers meet it doesn’t take very long before the conversations turns to the topic of this new version. Sometimes it makes good sense to upgrade but all too often this is done simply because an eager and very tech focused intranet manager wants the newest version. An even more common scenario is that the IT department tells the intranet team that they will now upgrade to the latest version as a part of the overall strategy (or some other reason) with no questions asked.

Let me always having the most recent piece of software is NOT a strategy. It’s an operational thing. Even if it is labeled as a strategic ambition, it is an incredibly stupid one! Strategies need to be made around what the platform – be that the intranet, record management system or something else – can help your colleagues, the users, achieve.

What about the scenario where the USERS are the ones asking for the new version of a given platform? It is not at all a common thing so I was really surprised that when Grundfos announced that the entire company should move to MS Office 365 I was approached by quite a few who excitedly asked “when are we getting Sharepoint?”. Why was that?

The answer is buried in the fact that our intranet is more than 10 years old. It is grown with the company and with the needs of my colleagues but more importantly, it has grown INSIDE the organization and little heed has been given to the outside world since our intranet was – and is – doing a good job. We are in a situation where we have had great success growing our intranet with the company to serve the needs of our colleagues but if you compare to what’s going on elsewhere it is clear that what started as a small discrepancy – a hairline fracture – has now grown into a big crevasse and we now need to prepare to take a big leap.

This is obviously a very daunting task but nevertheless one that has to be done. If we fail to do so people will start looking elsewhere. In Grundfos we have seen a spectacular uptake on the use of Yammer which I think is excellent but it also underlines my point that although a sustainable development model is the best way forward you inadvertently find yourself in a situation where radical change is needed. It’s a fact of life!

So how do you create an intranet strategy that work? My answer is short and simple: Make sure that you always grow with the company. Users hate surprises but every once in a (great) while you need to take a great leap forward to catch up otherwise people will be leaving. Most importantly you should never, ever stop listening to what your customers really need and it is NEVER “the latest version of SharePoint”…


If you are interested in reading more about my thoughts on the development gap that I have outlined here, I hope that I’ll see you in Gothenburg. If not, you can take a closer look at the J. Boye blog where I wrote a blogpost titled “Mind the gap – also when developing your intranet

IntraTeam Event 2013 – Personas, Yammer, and power in social networks

March 13, 2013

Normally I publish a brief review of the events I attend on this blog but this time is slightly different. The Intranetizens were not able to attend this year’s event in Copenhagen so I was asked if I could step in. No problem. Thus this year’s review of IntraTeam Event is published under the seemingly inconspicuous alias “Guestblogger” and you can find it by following this link:

IntraTeam Event 2013 Roundup

I also had the honor of doing a brief presentation about Yammer in Grundfos and judging from both the popularity on Slideshare but also on the testimonials from the other delegates it went very well. If you are interested in the presentation you can find it embedded below and you are of course more than welcome to contact me if you would like to know more about our Yammer journey in Grundfos.

Yammer – from 0 to 1500 in three weeks from Martin Risgaard

The first rule of Sharepoint is…

December 4, 2012

You do not talk about Sharepoint! I’m sure there are many other Fight Club related quotes to be said about intranets and platforms but the one mentioned here is very appropriate for my experiences from two conferences in the past month.

I have enjoyed the privelege of speaking at J. Boye 2012 in Aarhus and Intranett 2012 in Oslo and what stood out at both events was that technology is no longer taking center stage when you talk about intranets. Until very recent you could not attend an intranet event without half of the presentations were either about social media orSharepoint. Now we are talking about search, user experience, content strategy, etc. – why this change?

Part of the explanation is maturity. The technology platforms that intranets are built on have come of age and it is no longer common to hear of big migration projects or big bang launches (the latter, I find particularly good). The platforms now develop more consistently and continuously which makes the need to perform the “quantum leaps” of the past much less. Another part of the explanation might just be that many companies have been forced to prioritise differently due to the struggling economy. This means that you need to make ends meet and use what you already have.

The other big part and also the big upside is that the user is now in focus. It’s now about efficiency and productivity and to achieve this you must focus on the user experience. In my opinion this is indeed great news for both the end users but also for intranets in general.

Mind the gap – also when developing your intranet

October 29, 2012

It happens – more frequently than it should – that you meet an intranet manager with a somewhat disgruntled look on her face when you start talking about how their intranet is doing. More often than not this is because they are in the middle of a big redesign or a big upgrade to the next version of the intranet platform which ought to be good news. But often it is just one more in a long line of intranet projects which historically have been testing the patience of the intranet team – not to mention the colleagues.

The big problem is that the intranet is too often seen as a project. You may have a nice intranet vision that talks about how your intranet will be the one place above all and must support the business goals and strategies. So, I ask: Since when did it become a business goal to always use the latest version of SharePoint?

Read the answer and the entire post on the J. Boye blog – Posted ahead of the J. Boye conference in Aarhus next month where this will be the topic of my talk. I hope that I will see you there.

Continuous measurement of intranet user satisfaction – Can it be done?

July 3, 2012

Measurement and user satisfaction is something that all intranet people think about now and again me included. I have been running satisfaction surveys for a couple of years and although these big, annual surveys have produced very useful results I have thinking about a more continuous measurement of your intranet and how this can be done. I was introduced to the idea of Net Promoter Score which inspired me to think whether it was possible to create something similar for intranets. To explore this further I posted the following question in three LinkedIn groups.

“How do you continuously measure intranet satisfaction?”

I got some very good and insightful feedback from the group members and I will try to summarize and conclude in the following.

First of all the concept of Net Promoter Score where you ask users one and the same question will not work well for intranets. Firstly, the people in your target group are left with little choice where to go for information. You may have a fragmented digital workplace but the employees are still ‘forced’ to use what’s put in front of them. Secondly, you will be asking the same people the same question over and over expecting different results and that’s not very likely to happen.

Several contributors pointed out that people are fed up with surveys and pop-ups. I even blogged about what I have dubbed ‘survey fatigue’ so I cannot agree more but if we don’t ask, we won’t know.

After reading through the discussions I have discerned two themes which could be relevant for continuous measurement.

1. KPI Quesions
The key is to make these relevant to the organisation and to the purpose of your intranet. If you have an intranet strategy and/or purpose in place, this should be fairly easy and this sbould also enable you to find the Critical Business Requirements which you can base your questions around.

2. Feedback analysis
This obviously requires a structured method for collecting feedback. A great way to do this could be to team up with your helpdesk. This will allow you to create a sentiment analysis of the incoming feedback which will provide an insight into the atitude towards intranet and it may even tell you something about the organizational mood at any given time.

Inspired by the omnipresent feedback tabs on websites the two mentioned above could be combined in a quick questionnaire like the one below where I have assumed that the Critical Business Requirements are to be able to find up-to-date information quickly and easily, and of course that the intranet is relevant for the employees:

The obvious downside of the KPI measurement is that does not give you any pointers as to what areas you specifically need to address if you need to improve. I have some concerns that a generic satisfaction KPI will be just ‘for show’. It doesn’t provide anything but small clues as to what to change in order to improve, and it does little to justify why and where you need to invest time and/or money in developing your intranet. That said, I also believe that if you have a professional intranet team they are very likely to know exactly what levers to pull and buttons to push in order to improve, and by running the continuous analysis you will not have to wait for the annual survey to adjust your efforts.

In addition to this, I can’t help but think that if the Intranet community could agree on three benchmark questions we would have a way of comparing what we do. Intranets are sufficiently similar when it comes to the purpose of having one, yet different enough to create a need for bigger surveys and benchmark studies like they do at IBF or WIC. You still need those to get specific details on WHAT and HOW to improve your intranet, but for a quick comparison, the concept of an “Intranet Satisfaction Score” could still be useful.

What do you think? Will it make sense – let alone be possible – to have this kind of metric?


A special thank you to Martin White, Nigel Williams, William Amurgis, Nicolas Lethbridge, and many more for sharing insights thoughts and resources in the LinkedIn discussions. Among these resources I’d like to mention two in particular: A Metric Model For Intranet Portal Business Requirements and the Intranet Management Handbook

The Engaging, Social Intranet

April 4, 2012

How do we *do* social? In our wiki? In the document management system? …or do we just buy Chatter/Yammer/SocialCast? These questions are being asked in many organisations – my own included – and the answer is not always easy. Truth is we *do* social where it makes sense. It’s not about the tool, it’s about the context.

What about the social intranet? Personally, I’m not too fond of the term as it indicates that we need something new. A new intranet. This may very well be the case, but I find it much more important to look at when, where, and most importantly why people should use the social features on your intranet.

Chris McGrath and Ephraim Freed from Canadian ThoughFarmer have written a very interesting white paper that dives a bit deeper into what a social intranet is and what it can do for your enterprise. Among other things, they advocate that HR need to take a lead role in making companies more social and the workforce more engaged. I agree that HR is a vital player due to the fact that they reach all corners of the enterprise  but your social initiatives should be carried out in a symbiosis between Comms, IT, and of course HR.

One of the conclusions from Jane McConnell’s Digital Workplace Trends 2012 is that the emergence of collaboration solutions in companies is re-creating corporate silos – the very thing that increased collaboration was supposed to break down – but the main difference is that by introducing a social layer, i.e. a social intranet, you can bridge the silos and the serendipity of social media is likely to make it easier to discover gems of knowledge.

According to a study by Gallup, presented in the white paper, the companies with the most engaged employees have seen much higher growth rates than those with less engaged employees. This fact alone ought to command at least some attention from management. It’s hard to disagree that a happy employee is more likely to be an engaged employee – it’s harder to agree on how you make people happy (and make more $$$ along the way).

I strongly believe in the intranet as the hub for the digital workplace but as I wrote earlier I’m not too sure whether it should be dubbed a social intranet. It’s a matter of words, agree, but I would like to see it as “The People Centric Intranet”. The most important task on intranets in numerous surveys is to find people. The consumerization of internal platforms creates an expressed need to connect and follow fellow employees and share updates with them but you still have a large proportion of your intranet that consist of documents, forms, etc. which is not very social.

One of the big questions is what benefits you will get from a social intranet. It depends on the resources that you put into it but also on the culture of your company. If informal communities are common place, I would venture a guess that you are much more likely to succeed than if you come from a more traditional culture. A cultural change is a big job and this is where HR – due to their wide reach – would be formidable change agents. You people who can act as ‘flight attendants’ on the journey. You need to get safely airborne but once you are in the air the attendants need to make sure that the passengers are happy and have a comfortable journey. Hopefully it’s going to be a long haul flight :-)

One of the finishing comments in the whitepaper sums everything up very nicely:

“Successful social intranet become virtual places that employees inhabit rather than visit”

I personally believe that this should be the ultimate goal for all intranets – social or not.


These were some of my thoughts after reading the whitepaper. I strongly recommend that you download a copy and put it on your Easter reading list – you can find it here: ThoughtFarmer – Social Intranets & Employee Engagement


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 25 other followers